References
Allen, G. H., and T. M. Pavelsky (2015), Patterns of river width and surface area revealed by the satellite-derived North American River Width data set, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 395–402, doi:10.1002/ 2014GL062764.
Anderson, M.P., Woessner, W.W., and Hunt, R.J., 2015, Applied ground- water modeling—Simulation of flow and advective transport (2nd ed.): Academic Press, Inc., 564 p.
Clark, B.R., Barlow, P.M., Peterson, S.M., Hughes, J.D., Reeves, H.W., and Viger, R.J., 2018, National-scale grid to support regional groundwater availability studies and a national hydrogeologic database: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P84B24.
Clark, B.R., Westerman, D.A., and Fugitt, D.T., 2013, Enhancements to the Mississippi Embayment Regional Aquifer Study (MERAS) groundwater-flow model and simulations of sustainable water-level scenarios: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5161, 29 p., http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2013/5161/.
Feinstein, D.T., Hunt, R.J., and Reeves, H.W., 2010, Regional groundwater-flow model of the Lake Michigan Basin in support of Great Lakes Basin water availability and use studies: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5109, 379 p.
Fienen, M. N., and Bakker, M. (2016). Hess opinions: Repeatable research: What hydrologists can learn from the duke cancer research scandal. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 20 (9), 3739–3743. doi:10.5194/hess-20-3739-2016
Gardner, M.A., C.G. Morton, J.L. Huntington, R.G. Niswonger, and W.R. Henson. 2018. Input data processing tools for the integrated hydrologic model GSFLOW. Environmental Modelling & Software 109: 41–53.
Haitjema, H.M., 1995, Analytic element modeling of groundwater flow: San Diego, Academic Press, 394 p.
Harbaugh, A. W.: MODFLOW-2005, The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model – the Ground-Water Flow Pro- cess, in: Modeling techniques, Section A: Ground Water, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, USA, no. 16, p. 253, 2005.
Haugh, C.J., Killian, C.D., and Barlow, J.R.B., 2020, Simulation of water-management scenarios for the Mississippi Delta: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2019–5116, 15 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20195116.
Langevin, C.D., Hughes, J.D., Banta, E.R., Niswonger, R.G., Panday, Sorab, and Provost, A.M., 2017, Documentation for the MODFLOW 6 Groundwater Flow Model: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 6, chap. A55, 197 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6A55.
Leaf, A.T., Fienen, M.N., Hunt, R.J., and Buchwald, C.A., 2015, Groundwater/Surface-Water Interactions in the Bad River Watershed, Wisconsin: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5162, 110 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20155162.
Leaf, Andrew T., 2023, Automated construction of streamflow-routing networks for MODFLOW: application in the Mississippi Embayment region: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2022-XXXX, xx p. (in revision)
McKay, L., Bondelid, T., Dewald, T., Johnston, J., Moore, R., and Rea, A., 2012, NHDPlus Version 2—User guide, accessed November 15, 2014, at http://www.horizon-systems.com/NHDPlus/ NHDPlusV2_documentation.php.
Park, C. C. (1977), World-wide variations in hydraulic geometry exponents of stream channels: An analysis and some observations, J. Hydrol., 33(1–2), 133–146, doi:10.1016/0022-1694(77)90103-2.
Peng, R.D., 2011. Reproducible research in computational science, Science v. 334, no. 6060, p. 1226-1227. DOI: 10.1126/science.1213847
Prudic, D.E., Konikow, L.F., and Banta, E.R., 2004, A new Streamflow-Routing (SFR1) Package to simulate stream-aquifer interaction with MODFLOW–2000: U.S. Geological Survey Open–File Report 2004–1042, 95 p.